A brief synoptic parallel — Taking the side of the ‘modern’ in philosophy — Old and new relations between science and philosophy — Matrices and principles. Anti-Badiou relates the parallel stories of Badiou’s Maoist ‘ontology of the void’ and Laruelle’s own performative practice of ‘non-philosophy’. : Anti-Badiou: The Introduction of Maoism into Philosophy ( ) by Francois Laruelle and a great selection of similar New, Used and.
|Published (Last):||6 November 2004|
|PDF File Size:||12.30 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.49 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This is really the desire that Laruelle has lf his project: Or should we rather aim for a scientific-type knowledge of philosophy, a knowledge that would no doubt be contingent, but which, this time, would truly escape such doxa? Laruelle carefully examines Badiou’s Being and Event and shows how Badiou has created a new aristocracy that crowns his own philosophy as the master of an entire theoretical universe.
Find it on Scholar. Laruelle then undertakes a more careful examination of those differences in order to spell out where his own project differs and does so, in his view, for the better. At face value, the two have much in common: From this very programmatic chapter he then moves to two chapters that make up the primary polemic of the book.
Badiou’s entire project aims to re-educate philosophy through one science: While contemporary French philosophy, under the influence of Derrida’s deconstruction and Deleuze and Guattari’s schizoanalysis, has repressed this faith, Laruelle has attempted to show in his other works that this faith still lies beneath the surface and returns with a vengeance in their philosophical acts.
For this is but a ruse of power where philosophy, seeming to submit itself to the non philosophical, reasserts its mastery in being the only possible voice for the event.
Notify me of new comments via email. And it continues… this is only on page !! We require further details as to the new version of non-philosophy, and as to the analytic means that will allow us to detect in Badiou the indestructible residue of philosophy, and its conservation-reeducation by Cantor and Mao under the sign of Plato. In turn, Laruelle explains the contrast with his own non-philosophy as a true democracy of thought that breaks philosophy’s continual enthrall with mathematics and instead opens up a myriad of ‘non-standard’ places where thinking can be found and practised.
You are commenting using your WordPress. This critique takes place not on the grounds of any assumed weaknesses in Badiou’s understanding of mathematics or set theory in particular, but on the use that Badiou makes of mathematics. Share your thoughts with other customers.
Please try again later. It is certainly not binary by most present thinkers. Laruelle’s wager is that a non-standard philosophy may become a anti-bwdiou that the “radical Stranger” “works at transforming, with the aid of the world, the definitions of himself that he has received” Thus the emphasis is not on One, Two or Three, but the fact that one is compossible from zero, 0as two 0 0 and so on.
Much of this work was motivated by an attempt to respond to the various criticisms and perceived weaknesses of the first volume. Amazon Music Stream millions of songs.
Anti-Badiou: The Introduction of Maoism into Philosophy: Francois Laruelle: Bloomsbury Academic
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Yet, in contrast to this, we have the feminine not-All which reads: Alain Badiou – – Continuum.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed. This surface similarity can be summarized as the claim that philosophy is not sufficient in itself to do its work, but always requires some extra-philosophical material for its own function.
The result is very interesting as an elucidation of those ideas, but quite inadequate as an attempt to come to grips with Badiou’s philosophy and its flaws.
On Truth and Instrumentalisation. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here In response to the previous review I’d point out that in Principles of Non-Philosophy Laruelle specifically targets Badious “anti-philosophy” as remaining within the principle of sufficient philosophy and as auto-positional.
The Real of immanence, by virtue of the particle that it configures, is the non-dialectical solution to contradiction and to antinomies.
The Re-education of Philosophy by Mathematics: Laruelle carefully examines Badiou’s Being and Event and shows xnti-badiou Badiou has created a new aristocracy that crowns his own philosophy as the master of an entire theoretical universe. Amazon Inspire Digital Educational Resources.
But what we also see in this final chapter is the scope of non-philosophy, a scope that moves from what we would normally refer to as meta-philosophy, to epistemology, then to philosophy of religion, and finally to introduciton and political philosophy. A Critical Introduction to Non-philosophy.